In an authoritarian state an elite holds policy-making power and citizens capture little or no go in the political process. Authoritarianism is the opposite of democracy. Canada, on the other hand, is a participatory country that prides itself on citizens opinions that have at least or so part in the political process. But based on the characteristics of an authoritarian state - the supremacy of the state, collective society, changing lead - Canada seems to be portrayed as both an authoritarian and antiauthoritarian country.
In an authoritarian system the state holds all political power, and the finding of citizens is to serve the state. Obedience to the state means that slews actions are controlled, as they are not allowed to question publicly disposal policies or the actions of government officials. Also, the media is either owned or controlled by the state. Canadas participatory reputation does show interest in giving the people control of what goes on (When you take an interest in your community, when you diversity an opinion in politics, and when you go to cast your vote, you are part of government ), but the majority of power lies within the government officials (Together, Senators and Members of the House of Commons play an active role in the legislative process, contributing their ideas and energy to the creation of our laws.
For more than cxxx years, Parliamentarians past and present have participated in the development of our democracy, constitution Canadas destiny. ). As for the media, there is a degree of control by both large companies and government. On a survey slightly media concentration, respondents believed there to be too much media concentration in Canada with negative consequences for the content and variety of media coverage. (74% of respondents agreed and 15% disagreed with the statement: Some people believe...
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment