During the civil war there were two major Generals from two sides. For the Union there was a man named General Ulysses S. profess, and for the colleague side it was General Robert E. Lee. Even though they were both(prenominal) from the unite States they has extremely different ideas and tactics on how they thought they were passing game to win the war. On one hand General Grant thought that the best way to victory was the wear start General Lee and his legions, and to never retreat, and he did just that. other strategy made by the north was to stop totally imports to their enemy so they couldnt have a lot of ammunition or supplies. General Lee, however, pauperismed to conserve his troops and misrepresent sure that the little supplies he did have we not wasted.
They both utilized their own resources well. The north had to a greater extent men and more rifles, so they made sure that they were used well. The rifle gave a big advantage because you could easily reload and it made for quicker and bloodier combat. General Lee didnt have as many men nor supplies as the north, so he mat it beneficial to fill the north because his troops needed supplies and raw materials, and he felt that they were more accessible in the north.
The troops were also starved and the north had many farms so they could eat.
If I were a soldier I would have much rather been under the hold in of General Robert E. Lee. He was an honorable man that had very skilful ideas, and given the resources and the man power he could have by all odds won this war. General Grant didnt care about his troops and, since he would never retreat even if they were dying, didnt care if...
If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment