Critique of Jean Watson’s Theory Essay

The Theory of Human Caring was written by denim Watson. This model consists of ten carative factors to assist nurses with lovingness for their patients. Dr. Watson c all tolds this a transpersonal relationship. Watson defines transpersonal care as the capacity of one human race being to receive a nonher human beings expression of feelings and to experience those feelings for oneself (Walker, 1996, p. 992). It is much more than a scripted therapeutic response, it is a honourable duty that rises from within the nurse, and Watson identifies treat as both an art and a science.The first premise of this system is that the more individual the feelings are, that the nurse transmits, the more strongly does the caring subroutine affect the recipient (Walker, 1996). The two persons in a caring feat are both in the process of being and be overture.The moment of coming together in an actual caring occasion presents the opportunity for each(prenominal) person to learn from the other, how to be human. Watson implies more than a mere mergence of experiences she suggests a spiritual center of souls (Watson, 2008 Walker, 1996, p. 92). This writing will evaluate Watsons supposition and critique utilise Chinn and Kramers model of evaluation using description, clarity, simplicity, generalizability, accessibility, and magnificence (Meleis, 2012, p. 184). Clarity Watson precisely defines the concepts and sub concepts central to this surmisal. Watson explains scheme phenomena by using ordinary language in extraordinary ways, and uses nontechnical, sophisticated, fluid, and evolutionary language to trickily describe concepts.Watsons propensity toward metaphorical expression adds urgency to her moral message for nursing (Alligood & Tomey, 2010). At times, lengthy phrases and sentences mustiness be glance over more than once to convey meaning. The increasing inclusion of metaphors, personal reflections, artwork, and song make her complex concepts more tangible and more aesthetically challenge (Walker, 1996). According to Watson, A model of caring science that goes beyond an intellectualization of the topic invites us into a timeless yet timely seat to revisit this perennial phenomenon of the human condition (Watson, 2008, p. 8).Critics of Watsons work watch concentrated on the use of undefined or changing/ transformation definitions and terms and her focus on the psychosocial rather than the patho physiological aspects of nursing (Alligood & Tomey, 2010, p. 101). Watson tends to explain abstract phenomena by using ordinary language in extraordinary ways. Watsons propensity toward metaphorical expression adds urgency to her moral message for nursing (Walker, 1996). Simplicity Watson draws on a number of disciplines to formulate her theory.To understand the theory as it is presented, the reader does best by being familiar with the ample subject matter. The theory is more about being than about doing, and it must be internalized thoroughly by th e nurse if it is to be actualized in get along. wellness as harmonious unity of mind-body-soul recapitulates emphasis on human high-mindedness inspires nurses to readopt or realign themselves with a commitment to care (Walker, 1996). Basic concepts and exposit appeal to nurses trying to carve out a caring practice in the context of contemporary health care. GeneralizabilityWatsons theory seeks to cater a moral and philosophical basis for nursing. The scope of the framework encompasses all aspects of the health illness phenomenon. In addition the theory addresses aspects of preventing illness and experiencing a peaceful death, thereby increasing its inductive reasoning (Alligood & Tomey, 2010). The carative factors that Watson described provide distinguished guidelines for nurse patient interaction however, some critics have stated that their generality is limited by the emphasis place on psychosocial rather than physiological aspects of care (Alligood & Tomey, 2010).Transperso nal relationships can put the patient at ease, trust increases, and this is an special environment for healing to take place. Watson explains that concepts, defined as building blocks of theory, gain new meaning to the paradigm of nursing and were derived from clinically inducted, empirical experiences, combine with philosophical, intellectual and experiential background thus her early work emerged from her feature values, beliefs, and perceptions about personhood, life, health, and healing (Alligood & Tomey, 2010).Accessibility A nonher characteristic of the theory is that it does not furnish explicit directions about what to do to achieve authentic caring healing relationship. Nurses who want concrete guidelines may not feel untroubled when trying to rely on the theory alone. some suggest it would take too long to incorporate the caritas into practice, and others state that the emphasis on Watsons personal growth gives her latest book an idiosyncratic quality that eon appe aling to some may not appeal to others (Alligood & Tomey, 2010).This theory does not lend itself easily to research conducted through traditional scientific methods (Walker, 1996). Some critics have stated that generality is limited by the emphasis placed on psychosocial rather than physiological aspects of caring (Alligood & Tomey, 2010). Watson continues to state how the transpersonal relationship is the al-Qaida of her theory, she calls this a special kind of human care relationship, a union with another person-high regard for the whole person and their being in the dry land (Alligood & Tomey, 2010).