Marx And Mills Essay -- Marx Mills Philosophy Philosophical Essays

Marx And Mills John Stuart Mill suggests that a individuals good decision-making process should be based solely upon the heart and soul of happiness that the individual can receive. Although Mill fully justifies himself, his approach lacks definite criteria for which happiness can be considered. Happiness should be judged, non only by pleasure, only if by botheration as well. This paper leave alvirtuoso examine Mills position on happiness, and the reasoning tail end it. Showing where there are agreements and where there are disagreements give inspection the theory of Utilitarianism. By showing the problems that the theory have will queer what should make up ethical decision-making. John Stuart Mill supports and explains his reasoning in his book, Utilitarianism. Mill illustrates the postulatelines of his theory. Mill defines utilitarianism as the quest for happiness. His main point is that ane should guide his or her judgements by what will give pleasure. Mill belie ves that a person should always seek to gain pleasure and reject pain. Utilitarianism overly states that the actions of a person should be based upon the superlative happiness teaching. This principle states that ethical actions command the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people. Mill further explores the need for pleasure by noning a existence of higher faculties requires more to make him happy. . He acknowledges that around pleasures are more alluring than others are. He adds to this by making known that when placing measure show up in things to calculate pleasure, not only quantity important but quality as well. Mills criteria for happiness is easily understood, some statements that he gives are questionable. John Stuart Mill plainly laid out what he believes that the basis for ethical decision-making. First, the pursuit of pleasure is directly cerebrate to happiness. This idea can be easily accepted. It is natural for a person to focus his goals on things that will bring him pleasure. It would be absurd if someones goal in life was to be poor and starving. This being said, it does not mean that people are only happy collectable wealth but that no ones goals are center on poverty. Although there are many issues that can be accordant with Mill, there are problems that exist with his theory of utilitarianism. First, Mill says that all ethical decisions should be based on pleasure. This statement becomes questionable when Mill... ...o are gelid opposites. This statement holds true no matter what one believes. To find happiness, the oppose sides must find a suitable balance. This does not mean that pain is always a daily part of life, but that it can not and should not be avoided. If one were to try to avoid pain, it is quite assertable that they would inadvertently pass up pleasure. This would happen because a person would be too worried to take a chance on failing. hurting is a part of life just as pleasure is. To tra ce the benefits of one, there must be consequences given to the other. There is a abduce that goes, You must drink from the chalice of pain, before you can sip from the philosophers stone of self-respect Another criteria for happiness and morality should be based upon attentions. If one performs a moral action, but has immoral intentions, that person should not be considered ethically correct. To be truly right and happy, one must not only act but think right. Mill suggests that pleasure should guide our decision-making. While the statement is true, it is not fully correct. If a person will deal with pain that come from hard work, dedication, and perseverance, then the benefits will be that much sweeter.