'Consensus Decision Making Essay Essay\r'

'A ending is a determination of a question or question by qualification a judgment. Decisions are a dower of everyday life for normal valet de chambre beings and quite a little be as insignificant as to where to eat lunch, or as important as whether to pop the marriage question to a old girlfriend. Decisions can be get out in a variety of ways, but besides about of the time they are either made several(prenominal)ly or in a assemblage setting. Both item-by-item ratiocination making and root word end making tolerate their pros and cons, and can even determine the type of individual a person is. Decision making is non always an easy butt once to a greater extentst, but is a part of life.\r\nThere are study differences between class last making and individual decision making. When individuals are in a free radical, decision making could not only involve i person’s opinion, but everyone’s opinion which could become racy to the terminal outcome. This could roughlytimes prove it easier for a final decision to be reached, or maybe make it even harder to reach a final decision. Arguments and dis affiliatements can occur in group decision making ground on another(prenominal) mess’s opinions. abouttimes people try to persuade other individuals to change their decision to the one they want, by fully grown them their own opinions and making them seem alike facts. assemblage decision making can too be positive because on that point is more(prenominal) brain effect involved which can ultimately lead to a quick and more efficient type of decision making.\r\nThe other type of decision making is individual decision making. This type of decision is basically based solely on one opinion and one opinion only, which ultimately gets the individual what they want. The individual decision making also comes from one point of imbibe and only from the knowledge from the individual. This could lead to a misunderstand on ho w to finalize because the individual was presented the information to process and had a hard time understanding on which way to decide. The individual’s knowledge on the topic they are deciding on may be little to none, and could lead to a short decision. Either way, individual decision making and group decision making both give up their major differences, positives, and negatives.\r\nAll of the activities in class and the film â€Å"12 Angry Men,” give us individuals round attitude into decision making and also show us the explicit pros and cons. One very interesting and childs play assignment we had to do was the NASA assignment were as individuals we were apt(p) 15 choices of important items and had to rank them based on what we thought was important. Then we were put into groups and had to decide which ones were most important barring our opinions. Mevery people had irrelevant views on what was important and what was not, and some had not realize how impor tant an item was until they were in a group.\r\nIt was super interesting to see how all of the group members came to decisions on this although conflict had occurred. Another group activity that we did in class was the time capsule activity. This was another powerfully opinion based activity but because in that respect were other people in the group there were many items being tossed round. There wasn’t a set list of items to choose from like the NASA activity, so there were unlimited amount of choices and some choices were surprising. Some important items were many of the times overlooked by the people in the group because their opinion came into play, which was just like the NASA activity. There were many disagreements while operative in a group setting because some people may have different priorities.\r\nThe characterization â€Å"12 Angry Men” showed us more positives and negatives of individual and group decision making. In the radical of the movie all but one juryman votes individually decide that the man was guilty without any deliberation of the prove. After discussing each piece of separate the jury slows takes a turn towards not guilty. Although some were stubborn, the fact that all of the jurors talked out their opinions and had a fair(a) doubt had some of the change their decision to not guilty. After much deliberation and conflict, the jury was unanimously deciding that the accused was not guilty after(prenominal) all. This was after almost all of the jurors had decided guilty, which meant that the group decision making was much more happy than the individual decision making. The right decision was made in the end because of the talking and opinions that were thrown around which ultimately had the jurors changing their initial decisions.\r\nThis movie again showed us the positives and negatives when it comes to decision making. Many believe that group decision making is a much more efficient way of deciding outcomes whic h is why it is so often used in the United States Government. Examples like the House of Representatives and Congress show how many people deliberate about upstart decisions. Many new laws are discussed by these groups of people and then lastly passed to the president. This just exemplifies how people opinions and votes do matter to the government. Of telephone line the judicial branch is the branch the uses group decision making a lot.\r\nJury’s make decisions on crimes by deliberating and talking about evidence and whether there is a reasonable doubt. They reach a verdict together and all have to agree on the same thing. The executive branch also uses group decision making. The president just doesn’t make decisions based on his opinions, he ordinarily consults many people about new changes that he wants to make. The president is only one brain, and if he gets more opinions from other brains he can ultimately decide on whether or not this is going to realise socie ty as a whole. Individual decision making and group decision making have major differences. Both of them have their positives and negatives which are a part of everyday life, and are prevalent in the government.\r\n'